Data is utilized to understand the population being served by the organization to inform what representation looks like when engaging PWLE.
- To what extent do we understand the demographics of the community and populations our organization serves?
- What is the demographic make-up of our advisory committee or other groups of PWLE we partner with?
- Are there any significant differences between the demographics of the community our organization is located in and the demographics of our advisory committee or other groups of PWLE we partner with?
- Review available data – To understand demographics of your community and service populations, you can review available sources of data:
- Data your organization collects about the demographics of people served
- Census data
- Community health needs assessments
- Compare community and service populations – Check for differences between the demographics of the community your organization is located in and the demographics of your patient/client base. Differences may highlight barriers some populations face in accessing services or indicate strong ties to particular populations.
- Engage PWLE to address gaps – Work with PWLE to identify and understand gaps in representation in your service population and build better connections in underserved communities to reduce barriers.
- Assess representation in your work with PWLE – After you understand the demographics of your community and service population, the next step is to review the demographics of your current advisory members and other PWLE partners to identify representation gaps. You may already have a process in place for collecting this data, or you may need to create a new process to do this.
- Key demographic considerations for representation:
- Race/ethnicity
- Gender identity and sexual orientation
- Age
- Zip codes/neighborhoods
- Immigration status/country of origin
- Primary language spoken
- Socioeconomic status
- Disability status
- Relevant lived experience (e.g., health/medical conditions, housing status, caregiver status, substance use history)
Libby Hoy, Chief Executive Officer of PFCCpartners, discusses how defining the scope of engagement initiatives informs what representation looks like when engaging PWLE.
HealthierHere conducted a “membership gap assessment” for its Community Care Network Advisory Group (CCNAG). This involved reviewing the demographics of existing advisory group members and comparing them against the client populations served by their “hub” and the organizations participating in their network. This data-driven analysis helped identify specific priority areas for outreach to fill vacant seats with underrepresented groups.
Community Health Plan of Washington developed an “interest form” for its Community Advisory Council that allows individuals to describe their identity in their own words rather than being limited to predefined racial/ethnic categories, and asks about their areas of expertise and communities they represent.
“We have a requirement to collect demographic information as far as who’s represented on the council. So we wanted to think about how to collect this data without feeling like we are treating people like numbers. So we tried to create an interest form that was a little bit more inviting. Instead of having, you know, the five racial, ethnic groups, it’s just a question, “How do you identify and how would you like to be represented?” And there are, of course, data points that they can select from, but we kept it very open for individuals to write how they would like to be identified. And same thing with areas of expertise. I really wanted to get a sense of the expertise within the community, so that was an open question. For example, “what would you like to bring to the council? What areas of expertise do you bring and are there certain communities that you work directly with that you would like reflected or represented on this council?””